fix(l10n): align the stores dialog with the setup trust hint (Sie-form, plain language)
Some checks failed
Security / Security check (push) Failing after 1s

The regulated setup path sends the operator to the stores dialog to
pin a publisher key — but the field was labelled 'Angepinnter
Public-Key — PEM (optional)' with du-form developer prose (PEM,
vendor key) at exactly the trust-critical moment. Field now reads
'Signatur-Schlüssel anheften (PEM, optional)' with a plain-language
Sie-form explanation of what pinning does; the dialog intro and the
onboarding checklist follow (MCP jargon explained in the sentence,
developer-only follow-up cards labelled as such).

Signed-off-by: flemming-it <stefan.a.flemming@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
flemming-it 2026-07-13 01:26:33 +02:00
parent ddac84ce8e
commit 7888b71f63
5 changed files with 18 additions and 19 deletions

View file

@ -378,8 +378,8 @@
"storesManagerRemoveFailed": "Could not remove store",
"storesManagerSuggested": "Suggested stores",
"storesManagerAddShort": "Add",
"storesManagerPinnedKeyLabel": "Pinned public key — PEM (optional)",
"storesManagerPinnedKeyHint": "Signed modules from this store verify against this key instead of the built-in vendor key. Paste a PEM public key.",
"storesManagerPinnedKeyLabel": "Pin a signing key (PEM, optional)",
"storesManagerPinnedKeyHint": "Only modules signed with this key are accepted from this source. Paste the publisher's public key (PEM) — used instead of the built-in vendor key.",
"storesManagerNotAvailable": "Not available yet",
"storesManagerNotAvailableHint": "The provider hasn't published this store index yet. It will become installable once they do.",
"storesSuggestedReclaimDesc": "Recl∆Im — modules for law & duty reform-mapping",