fix(approvals,l10n,theme): usertest findings — localized prompts, no-data confirm, .chain log path, honest wording, AA contrast
Some checks failed
Security / Security check (push) Failing after 2s
Some checks failed
Security / Security check (push) Failing after 2s
- approvals: empty/legacy hub prompts render the localized fallback; approving without show: data asks for conscious confirmation first - chain_log: write to ~/.chain/logs/studio-errors.log (was .fai), one-time best-effort migration of the legacy file + rotation sibling - l10n: 'manipulationssicher' -> 'manipulationserkennend', neutral WORM-1 blurb, doctor pill 'Integritätskette v1', federation hint says the CA authenticates the first connect (DE+EN) - theme: muted text token now >=4.5:1 on canvas, cards and elevated dark surfaces (was 3.7:1 on cards) Signed-off-by: flemming-it <stefan.a.flemming@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0fda2600ad
commit
bb606a8b23
10 changed files with 167 additions and 26 deletions
|
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
|
|||
"welcomeDocSecurityTitle": "Sandbox model",
|
||||
"welcomeDocSecurityBlurb": "What a module declares, what the operator caps, what the hub enforces.",
|
||||
"welcomeDocAuditTitle": "Tamper-evident audit log",
|
||||
"welcomeDocAuditBlurb": "How the hash chain works and why WORM-1 is enough for KRITIS.",
|
||||
"welcomeDocAuditBlurb": "How the hash chain makes later edits detectable — and what integrity level WORM-1 does (and does not) provide.",
|
||||
"welcomeDocFlowsTitle": "Flow composition",
|
||||
"welcomeDocFlowsBlurb": "YAML basics, templating reference, the extract→summarize example.",
|
||||
"welcomeDocApprovalsTitle": "Approvals",
|
||||
|
|
@ -1064,6 +1064,9 @@
|
|||
"approvalsPillExpired": "expired",
|
||||
"approvalsPayloadPreview": "DATA TO REVIEW",
|
||||
"approvalsNoPayload": "No data was attached for review. The flow's approval step chooses what to show via its \"show:\" field — set it to surface the data behind this decision.",
|
||||
"approvalsNoDataConfirmTitle": "Approve without review data?",
|
||||
"approvalsNoDataConfirmBody": "This flow deliberately attached no review data (no \"show:\" on its approval step). You can still approve — but you would be deciding without seeing the data behind this decision.",
|
||||
"approvalsNoDataConfirmAction": "Approve anyway",
|
||||
"approvalsRequestFallback": "Approval required for this step",
|
||||
"approvalsFlowStepMeta": "Flow: {flow} · Step: {step}",
|
||||
"@approvalsFlowStepMeta": {
|
||||
|
|
@ -1217,7 +1220,7 @@
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"doctorChainPillOk": "WORM-1",
|
||||
"doctorChainPillOk": "Integrity chain v1",
|
||||
"doctorChainPillTamper": "TAMPER",
|
||||
"doctorVerifyNow": "Verify now",
|
||||
"doctorRestart": "Restart",
|
||||
|
|
@ -1700,5 +1703,5 @@
|
|||
"federationTokenLabel": "Bootstrap token (single use)",
|
||||
"federationConfigLabel": "Satellite config (paste into the satellite)",
|
||||
"federationCopied": "Copied to clipboard",
|
||||
"federationEnrollmentHint": "Hand the token to the satellite operator over a secure channel. The bundled CA makes the satellite's first connect tamper-proof."
|
||||
"federationEnrollmentHint": "Hand the token to the satellite operator over a secure channel. The bundled CA authenticates the satellite's first connect."
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue