The hub copies the reviewer string a client sends straight into
decided_by (DecideApproval, ClearEventLog); nothing on the wire ties
it to the authenticated caller. Studio filled it from the OS account,
so an export read like non-repudiation while being an arbitrary
client claim — the legal finding of the 2026-07-26 usertest panel.
The real fix is hub-side (derive decided_by from CALLER_IDENTITY);
that contract is written down in docs/reviewer-identity.md and needs
a hub release. Until then Studio does the one thing it can do
honestly and marks its own claim as a claim, inside the record:
- data/reviewer_identity.dart is the single place that produces and
reads the value; wire() is idempotent, so page and HubService may
both normalise. Every write path funnels through HubService, so no
surface can send a bare handle.
- The inbox states before the decision who will be recorded, what
that attribution is worth on this hub (from AuthStatus), and the
literal string that lands in decided_by. An unreadable auth policy
stays unreadable — never optimistic.
- Reading back: a marked value shows its plain name plus an
unchecked flag; an unmarked one (legacy row, CLI decision, or a
future hub-derived identity) is not classified either way.
- The audit wipe seeds the same kind of marked attribution into its
chain.reset marker.
When the hub starts deriving the value it overwrites the field and
the prefix disappears by itself — no Studio release needed.
Guards: reviewer_identity_test (the value) and
approvals_reviewer_identity_test (every surface that writes or
renders it, against the hermetic fake hub). Visual proof for both
themes via the dialog-shot harness.
Signed-off-by: flemming-it <stefan.a.flemming@googlemail.com>
The detail sheet always answers 'who maintains this?': one
selectable line per maintainer from the store index's new
maintainers list, or an honest 'not specified' when the index
names nobody (StoreMaintainersSection, public for the widget
tests). The install trust gate carries the same fact when
present and stays terse otherwise. DE+EN; dialog-harness proof
captured with the maintainer row.
Signed-off-by: flemming-it <stefan.a.flemming@googlemail.com>
The capability set behind the flow editor's Install quick-fix and
the flow list's install badge ingested every store entry's
requiresCapabilities (dependencies, not provided capabilities) and
ignored entry status/kind. Clicking Install on such a capability
ended in the hub's "no store entry for '<name>'" error.
The set now mirrors the hub's install resolver (entry names only,
no planned or federated entries) via installableStoreCapabilities()
with unit tests for both classification states. Unresolvable
capabilities render the editor's 'not in store' state, which
explains the three recovery paths before any click; the editor pin
moves to 0.25.0 (commit-pinned until its tag exists) and the dialog
harness captures the badge states light+dark. Studio 0.78.0.
Signed-off-by: flemming-it <stefan.a.flemming@googlemail.com>
The trust-gate dialog replaces its generic 'no per-entry status yet
(alpha)' note with the hub's classified verification statement —
pinned store key / trusted publishers (green), installs without
signature checking (amber), install would be refused (red), bridge
entry (neutral) — via one shared describeInstallVerification mapping.
Against a pre-0.23 hub the field is empty and the old honest wording
stays (pinned by test).
Information architecture: policy-off is a GLOBAL fact, so it appears
as ONE ChainInlineHelp notice above the store grid instead of a
warning pill on every card (card noise); only 'blocked' — a genuine
per-source anomaly — earns a card pill. Doctor's host services show
the hub-classified network reach per endpoint (local only / private
network / publicly reachable with a protect-it hint / reach unknown).
Verified end-to-end against the live dev hub (guide harness): the
wire field arrives, the store page shows exactly one policy notice
and quiet cards; trust-gate variants captured via the dialog
harness. Suite 123 green.
Signed-off-by: flemming-it <stefan.a.flemming@googlemail.com>
New ChainInlineHelp (intro strip: what this is + what will happen, with
an optional 'Learn more' into the doc sheet) and ChainFieldHelp /
ChainFieldLabel (a '?' affordance per field). First applied to the
add-satellite dialog, which asked for a bare 'name' with no hint of
what a satellite is or does (usertest): it now leads with a plain
explanation + a federation 'Learn more', and the name field carries a
'?'. Both widgets are quiet by design.
Verified: field_help_test covers the widgets + that the dialog explains
itself; dialog_shots_test.dart (a reusable headed dialog-capture
harness) proved the layout in light + dark. Studio 0.76.0.
Signed-off-by: flemming-it <stefan.a.flemming@googlemail.com>
