feat: initial F∆I Law-Heatmap Phase 0 scaffold

First end-to-end-buildable cut of the pflicht-/graph-basierte
Wirkungsanalyse von Rechtsnormen, running on Ch∆In. Demo runs
without external dependencies and without a hub connection so
the methodology + UI stack can be reviewed before any Verbands-
Kooperation or Beirats-Validierung kicks in.

Tree layout

  MACHBARKEITSSTUDIE.md       v0.3 — pflicht-basierte Methodik,
                              4-Tier-Evidenz, 8 law*-Module
                              auf Ch∆In statt der alten F∆I-
                              Plattform.
  RUN.md                      one-page how-to-run.
  flows/durchstich-gewo-14.yaml
                              vertical Phase-0 flow: pull →
                              normalize → duties → citations →
                              cohort → skm → frust → benefit →
                              attribution → system.approval.
  app/                        Flutter macOS client, design
                              language pulled from fai_web
                              (ink #08090A, paper #F4F3EF,
                              petrol signal #2E8F9E). Mock
                              repository ships five fixture
                              norms with real source URLs and a
                              permanent T4 demo-banner so no
                              figure can be mistaken for a
                              validated one.

Module repos (separate, see chain-modules*/):

  text-akoma-normalize, text-deontic-extract, graph-citation-
  extract, text-readability-score, stats-cohort-size, graph-
  shapley-attribution, econ-skm-score, law-benefit-score.

What runs today

  - flutter analyze: 0 issues
  - flutter test: 2/2 (landing + nav-to-shell smoke)
  - flutter build macos (via app/build-macos.sh) and ad-hoc
    codesign, app launches and the Dart VM service comes up
  - native cargo test green on every module
  - cargo build --release --target wasm32-wasip2 produces a
    130 KiB artefact for text-akoma-normalize

What is deliberately mock / stub

  - gRPC wire from the client to a chain serve hub (Repository
    abstraction is in place; live impl is the next step)
  - NKR Bürokratiekosten-Datenbank ingestion (for the canonical
    h-Werte that close out the Engpass per Studie §6.7)
  - DESTATIS GENESIS-API adapter for stats.cohort_size

License: Apache-2.0. Author/contact in MACHBARKEITSSTUDIE.md.
Signed-off-by: flemming-it <sf@flemming.it>
This commit is contained in:
flemming-it 2026-06-18 11:26:28 +02:00
commit 8ee6a294a1
64 changed files with 5641 additions and 0 deletions

274
app/lib/data/fixtures.dart Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
import 'models.dart';
/// Phase-0 fixture data for the five pilot norms.
///
/// **THIS IS DEMO DATA.** The numbers are plausible (drawn from
/// public NKR/DIHK/DESTATIS reporting where available), but the
/// composed scores have NOT been peer-reviewed. The UI displays a
/// permanent "Demo / nicht freigegeben" banner whenever this data
/// is on screen see [HeatmapPage] and the `tierLowest = T4` cap
/// applied to every fixture below.
///
/// Source pointers per Norm are real and clickable so the
/// methodological audit story stays intact even in demo mode.
class Fixtures {
static final List<Evaluation> evaluations = [
_gewo14,
_kassenSichV,
_dsgvoArt30,
_berlinBauO60,
_miLoG17,
];
static final _gewo14 = Evaluation(
norm: Norm(
eli: 'eli/bund/gewo/14',
title: 'Anzeigepflicht',
jurabk: 'GewO',
paragraph: '§ 14',
standDate: DateTime.utc(2025, 12, 1),
sourceUrl: 'https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gewo/__14.html',
sourceSha256: 'demo-${'a' * 60}',
),
skmEurPerYear: 2_800_000,
benefitScore: 2.5,
affectedCount: 180_000,
frustScore: 4.5,
tierLowest: EvidenceTier.t4,
duties: const [
Duty(
modality: 'OBLIGATION',
addressee: 'Gewerbetreibende',
action: 'Beginn, Wechsel, Aufgabe eines stehenden Gewerbes anzeigen',
frequency: 'anlassbezogen',
sourceNorm: 'GewO § 14',
authority: 'zuständige Behörde am Niederlassungsort',
),
],
sources: const [
Source(
label: 'BMJ — gesetze-im-internet.de',
url: 'https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gewo/__14.html',
tier: EvidenceTier.t1,
),
Source(
label: 'NKR Bürokratiekosten-Datenbank',
url: 'https://www.normenkontrollrat.bund.de/',
tier: EvidenceTier.t1,
note: 'h-Wert noch nicht NKR-validiert',
),
Source(
label: 'IHK Berlin — Mittelstandsumfrage 2025',
url: 'https://www.ihk.de/berlin',
tier: EvidenceTier.t2,
),
],
auditEventId: 'demo-evt-gewo-14',
notes:
'Demo-Schätzung. h aus IHK-Beispielwert, P aus DESTATIS Unternehmensregister Berlin.',
);
static final _kassenSichV = Evaluation(
norm: Norm(
eli: 'eli/bund/kassensichv',
title: 'Kassensicherungsverordnung',
jurabk: 'KassenSichV',
paragraph: 'gesamt',
standDate: DateTime.utc(2025, 11, 15),
sourceUrl:
'https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kassensichv/index.html',
sourceSha256: 'demo-${'b' * 60}',
),
skmEurPerYear: 25_000_000,
benefitScore: 3.0,
affectedCount: 500_000,
frustScore: 7.5,
tierLowest: EvidenceTier.t4,
duties: const [
Duty(
modality: 'OBLIGATION',
addressee: 'Betreiber elektronischer Kassen',
action: 'TSE-Zertifizierte Sicherheitseinrichtung einsetzen',
frequency: 'kontinuierlich',
sourceNorm: 'KassenSichV § 14',
authority: 'Finanzamt / BSI',
consequence: 'Bußgeld bis 25.000 €',
),
Duty(
modality: 'OBLIGATION',
addressee: 'Betreiber',
action: 'TSE-Ausfall an Finanzamt melden',
frequency: 'anlassbezogen',
sourceNorm: 'KassenSichV § 3',
authority: 'Finanzamt',
),
],
sources: const [
Source(
label: 'BMJ — gesetze-im-internet.de',
url:
'https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kassensichv/index.html',
tier: EvidenceTier.t1,
),
Source(
label: 'DIHK — Bürokratie-Index 2025',
url: 'https://www.dihk.de/buerokratie',
tier: EvidenceTier.t2,
),
Source(
label: 'DEHOGA Berlin Mittelstandsumfrage',
url: 'https://www.dehoga-berlin.de/',
tier: EvidenceTier.t2,
note: 'h-Wert aus Gastronomie-Stichprobe',
),
],
auditEventId: 'demo-evt-kassensichv',
notes:
'Demo. Hoher Frust-Score wegen TSE-Ausfallmeldung + Hardware-Folgekosten.',
);
static final _dsgvoArt30 = Evaluation(
norm: Norm(
eli: 'eli/eu/reg/2016/679/art30',
title: 'Verzeichnis von Verarbeitungstätigkeiten',
jurabk: 'DSGVO',
paragraph: 'Art. 30',
standDate: DateTime.utc(2025, 10, 1),
sourceUrl: 'https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679',
sourceSha256: 'demo-${'c' * 60}',
),
skmEurPerYear: 450_000_000,
benefitScore: 3.8,
affectedCount: 3_000_000,
frustScore: 8.5,
tierLowest: EvidenceTier.t4,
duties: const [
Duty(
modality: 'OBLIGATION',
addressee: 'Verantwortliche + Auftragsverarbeiter',
action: 'Verzeichnis aller Verarbeitungstätigkeiten führen',
frequency: 'jährlich überprüfen',
sourceNorm: 'DSGVO Art. 30 Abs. 1+2',
authority: 'Aufsichtsbehörde (auf Verlangen)',
consequence: 'Bußgeld bis 10 Mio € / 2 % Jahresumsatz',
),
],
sources: const [
Source(
label: 'EUR-Lex — DSGVO Art. 30',
url: 'https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679',
tier: EvidenceTier.t1,
),
Source(
label: 'DIHK — DSGVO-Belastung der Wirtschaft 2024',
url: 'https://www.dihk.de/dsgvo',
tier: EvidenceTier.t2,
),
Source(
label: 'BfDI — Tätigkeitsbericht',
url: 'https://www.bfdi.bund.de/',
tier: EvidenceTier.t1,
),
],
auditEventId: 'demo-evt-dsgvo-30',
notes:
'Demo. EU-determiniert → Reform-Vorschlag muss Brüssel adressieren, nicht DE-Streichung.',
);
static final _berlinBauO60 = Evaluation(
norm: Norm(
eli: 'eli/land/be/bauo/60',
title: 'Bauantrag',
jurabk: 'BauO Bln',
paragraph: '§ 60 ff',
standDate: DateTime.utc(2025, 9, 1),
sourceUrl:
'https://gesetze.berlin.de/bsbe/document/jlr-BauOBE2005V25P60',
sourceSha256: 'demo-${'d' * 60}',
),
skmEurPerYear: 72_000_000,
benefitScore: 3.5,
affectedCount: 15_000,
frustScore: 9.0,
tierLowest: EvidenceTier.t4,
duties: const [
Duty(
modality: 'OBLIGATION',
addressee: 'Bauherr',
action: 'Bauantrag mit Bauvorlagen einreichen',
frequency: 'pro Bauvorhaben',
sourceNorm: 'BauO Bln § 6069',
authority: 'Bauaufsichtsbehörde Bezirk',
),
],
sources: const [
Source(
label: 'landesrecht-berlin.de',
url:
'https://gesetze.berlin.de/bsbe/document/jlr-BauOBE2005V25P60',
tier: EvidenceTier.t1,
),
Source(
label: 'Handwerkskammer Berlin — Bauantragsdauer 2025',
url: 'https://www.hwk-berlin.de/',
tier: EvidenceTier.t2,
),
Source(
label: 'mein.berlin.de — Bürgerbeteiligung Bauverfahren',
url: 'https://mein.berlin.de/',
tier: EvidenceTier.t4,
),
],
auditEventId: 'demo-evt-berlinbauo-60',
notes:
'Demo. Höchster Frust-Score (Verweistiefe + Behörden-Pluralität Bezirk×Senat).',
);
static final _miLoG17 = Evaluation(
norm: Norm(
eli: 'eli/bund/milog/17',
title: 'Dokumentationspflichten',
jurabk: 'MiLoG',
paragraph: '§ 17',
standDate: DateTime.utc(2025, 11, 1),
sourceUrl: 'https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/milog/__17.html',
sourceSha256: 'demo-${'e' * 60}',
),
skmEurPerYear: 270_000_000,
benefitScore: 3.2,
affectedCount: 3_000_000,
frustScore: 7.0,
tierLowest: EvidenceTier.t4,
duties: const [
Duty(
modality: 'OBLIGATION',
addressee: 'Arbeitgeber in MiLoG-relevanten Branchen',
action: 'Beginn, Ende, Dauer der täglichen Arbeitszeit aufzeichnen',
frequency: 'arbeitstäglich',
sourceNorm: 'MiLoG § 17 Abs. 1',
authority: 'Zoll (FKS)',
consequence: 'Bußgeld bis 30.000 €',
),
],
sources: const [
Source(
label: 'BMJ — gesetze-im-internet.de',
url: 'https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/milog/__17.html',
tier: EvidenceTier.t1,
),
Source(
label: 'NKR — Stellungnahme Mindestlohngesetz',
url: 'https://www.normenkontrollrat.bund.de/',
tier: EvidenceTier.t1,
),
Source(
label: 'ZDH — Bürokratiekosten Handwerk',
url: 'https://www.zdh.de/',
tier: EvidenceTier.t2,
),
],
auditEventId: 'demo-evt-milog-17',
notes:
'Demo. P × F × T × h: 3 Mio Betroffene × 220 Arbeitstage × 0,1h × 30€/h.',
);
}

144
app/lib/data/models.dart Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
// Domain model for the FI Law-Heatmap client.
//
// These types are the lingua franca between the (eventually
// gRPC-fed) repository and the UI. Names mirror the Studie's
// §5.3 data model.
/// Evidence tier of the lowest-tier ingredient in a value.
/// Per Studie §6.7: "Regel der niedrigsten Stufe" any composed
/// figure carries the tier of its weakest input.
enum EvidenceTier {
/// Official / peer-reviewed: NKR, DESTATIS, ifo, ZEW.
t1,
/// Verbands-Erhebung: DIHK, BDI, ZDH, IHK.
t2,
/// Eigene strukturierte Erhebung (Phase 2/3).
t3,
/// Qualitatives Signal pain indicator only, never magnitude.
t4,
}
extension EvidenceTierLabel on EvidenceTier {
String get short => switch (this) {
EvidenceTier.t1 => 'T1',
EvidenceTier.t2 => 'T2',
EvidenceTier.t3 => 'T3',
EvidenceTier.t4 => 'T4',
};
String get description => switch (this) {
EvidenceTier.t1 => 'amtlich / peer-reviewed',
EvidenceTier.t2 => 'Verband',
EvidenceTier.t3 => 'eigene Erhebung',
EvidenceTier.t4 => 'qualitatives Signal',
};
}
/// A citable source never an LLM, always a public document or
/// dataset reference. UI surfaces these next to every figure.
class Source {
const Source({
required this.label,
required this.url,
required this.tier,
this.note,
});
final String label;
final String url;
final EvidenceTier tier;
final String? note;
}
/// One atomic obligation (Pflicht) extracted from a norm.
/// Tuple shape matches Studie §6.3.
class Duty {
const Duty({
required this.modality,
required this.addressee,
required this.action,
required this.frequency,
required this.sourceNorm,
this.authority,
this.consequence,
});
final String modality; // OBLIGATION | PROHIBITION |
final String addressee;
final String action;
final String frequency;
final String sourceNorm;
final String? authority;
final String? consequence;
}
/// One norm version a versioned legal text identified by its
/// (synthetic for now) ELI/CELEX.
class Norm {
const Norm({
required this.eli,
required this.title,
required this.jurabk,
required this.paragraph,
required this.standDate,
required this.sourceUrl,
required this.sourceSha256,
});
final String eli;
final String title;
final String jurabk;
final String paragraph;
final DateTime standDate;
final String sourceUrl;
final String sourceSha256;
}
/// A heatmap point: one norm with its computed scores.
/// Axes mirror §6 in the study.
class Evaluation {
const Evaluation({
required this.norm,
required this.skmEurPerYear,
required this.benefitScore,
required this.affectedCount,
required this.frustScore,
required this.tierLowest,
required this.duties,
required this.sources,
required this.auditEventId,
this.notes,
});
final Norm norm;
/// Yearly bureaucracy cost across the addressee population.
/// /year, computed via SKM (`P × F × T × h`).
final double skmEurPerYear;
/// 05, composite of seven dimensions
/// (safety / market / legal-certainty / EU-harmony / ).
final double benefitScore;
/// Number of addressees (KMU, Bürger, etc.). UI uses this for
/// heatmap point size.
final int affectedCount;
/// 010, composite of readability + Verweistiefe + Akteurs-
/// pluralität + Norm-Volatilität.
final double frustScore;
/// Lowest tier among all ingredients of any displayed figure.
final EvidenceTier tierLowest;
final List<Duty> duties;
final List<Source> sources;
/// Pointer into the ChIn audit log (SQLite event_log row).
final String auditEventId;
final String? notes;
}

View file

@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
import 'models.dart';
import 'fixtures.dart';
/// Repository abstraction for evaluations.
///
/// Phase 0 ships exactly one implementation: [MockRepository],
/// backed by [Fixtures]. The live implementation (gRPC against a
/// running `chain serve`) lands in Phase 0 week 1 its API will
/// match this interface so no UI change is needed.
abstract class EvaluationRepository {
Future<List<Evaluation>> list();
Future<Evaluation?> byEli(String eli);
String get mode;
String get hubLabel;
}
/// In-memory, no-network implementation. Marks itself clearly so
/// the UI shows a "demo mode" badge.
class MockRepository implements EvaluationRepository {
const MockRepository();
@override
Future<List<Evaluation>> list() async => Fixtures.evaluations;
@override
Future<Evaluation?> byEli(String eli) async {
for (final e in Fixtures.evaluations) {
if (e.norm.eli == eli) return e;
}
return null;
}
@override
String get mode => 'demo';
@override
String get hubLabel => 'in-memory fixtures (kein Hub)';
}