Recl∆Im — Pflicht-basierte Wirkungsanalyse von Rechtsnormen auf Ch∆In (F∆I)
flemming-it
12b6961f7e
Each of the five fixture Evaluations now carries a notes field
that breaks the lowest-tier-rule (Studie §6.7) into its four
SKM components (Population, Frequenz, Tarif, Zeitaufwand) and
names which one is the bottleneck. Tier markings stay
conservatively T4 on the surface — what changes is that a
reviewer reading the norm-detail panel now sees:
- which Komponenten are real T1 numbers (DESTATIS-derived P,
Verdiensterhebung-T) vs. where the demo extrapolates
- which Komponenten still wait on NKR-Validierung (mostly h)
- the political bottom line per norm: GewO §14 needs an
NKR-h-Wert; KassenSichV is largely documented; DSGVO Art.30
is EU-bound, reform-Hebel sits in Brüssel; BauO Bln §60 is
Land-domain without Bundes-NKR support; MiLoG §17 is under
Bürokratieentlastungsgesetz-IV-Bewegung.
No data-model change. Same fixtures, more honest reading.
Signed-off-by: flemming-it <sf@flemming.it>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| app | ||
| flows | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| MACHBARKEITSSTUDIE.md | ||
| METHODIK.md | ||
| NOTICE | ||
| RUN.md | ||