Recl∆Im — Pflicht-basierte Wirkungsanalyse von Rechtsnormen auf Ch∆In (F∆I)
The four-line description above the heatmap was concise but opaque: 'X: log10 €/year. Y: 0–5. Punktgröße.' said the right words, but a reviewer who isn't already methodologically oriented can't tell what they're looking at. Adds a dedicated Legende-Karte directly under the heatmap. Four rows, each: leading symbol (↔ ↕ ● ◐), axis-or-quantity label, prominent name (Schaden / Nutzen / Betroffenheit / Evidenz-Stufe), and a short prose explanation tying the visual back to the Studie: ↔ Abszisse (X) Schaden — log10 €/Jahr, SKM §3.1 ↕ Ordinate (Y) Nutzen — 7-dim. Komposit §3.2 ● Punktgröße Betroffenheit — sqrt scale, DESTATIS-/IHK ◐ Tier-Farbe Evidenz-Stufe — Regel der niedrigsten §6.7 Top description tightened to one line of context only: 'Schaden × Nutzen × Betroffenheit pro Norm. Klick auf einen Punkt öffnet das Detail …'. No redundancy with the legend, no jargon up top. Signed-off-by: flemming-it <sf@flemming.it> |
||
|---|---|---|
| app | ||
| flows | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| MACHBARKEITSSTUDIE.md | ||
| METHODIK.md | ||
| NOTICE | ||
| RUN.md | ||